本帖最後由 JIMillim 於 2020-10-1 17:05 編輯
留意底板對 ClockTuner for Ryzen(CTR) 有明顯影響
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/clocktuner_for_ryzen_ctr_guide_download,4.html
ASUS boards have a bonus in this regard, which allows the user to customize VRM individually for their tasks. During internal testing, in addition to ASUS motherboards, the CTR project demonstrated excellent MSI compatibility. Gigabyte was slightly behind because in Auto mode Vdroop was far from the recommended range, which is 1-2.3%. Despite the excellent VRM components, ASRock boards in most cases failed to meet the challenge set by CTR. Vdroop "floated" within the range of 6 - 3%. Of course, this can be fixed in microcode, but it's up to ASRock to meet the users. Unfortunately, I did not have a BIOSTAR board.
华硕主板在这方面有一个加分项,用户可以根据自己的任务单独定制VRM。在内测过程中,除了华硕主板外,CTR项目还表现出了优秀的微星兼容性。技嘉稍显落后,因为在自动模式下,Vdroop与推荐范围相差甚远,也就是1-2.3%。尽管华擎主板采用了优秀的VRM组件,但在大多数情况下,华擎主板都未能达到CTR设定的挑战。Vdroop "浮动 "在6-3%的范围内。当然,这可以在微码中解决,但能否满足用户的要求,就要看华擎了。遗憾的是,我没有BIOSTAR板子。
通过 www.DeepL.com/Translator(免费版)翻译 |