W君

原帖由 samiux 於 2008-12-25 11:55 發表


Ubuntu has contribute to Linux kernel.  Ubuntu kernel is different to Debian kernel.  Ubuntu also develops some utilities for her distribution that also suit for other distributions.

Ubuntu has Ubu ...

Linux is for clever persons.  Linux is for professionals.
呢到要小心D
好多MS派係到,咁講野會比人圍

samiux

原帖由 W君 於 2008-12-25 12:59 發表

Linux is for clever persons.  Linux is for professionals.
呢到要小心D
好多MS派係到,咁講野會比人圍

An advertising stated that clever customers have choice and they will choose the products that suit them.

Linux is based on Unix standard.  Unix is a powerful, well-defined and well-designed operating system in 50s.  50s product still alive in modern world.  See ....  Professional!

valleybok

原帖由 foobar 於 2008-12-25 11:33 發表
我其實有 D 好奇點解樓主揀 OpenSuSE, 但後來又提到 "如果可以的話就由RPM轉為預設DEB"

轉 Package Manager 同自己由頭 maintain 過晒 D packages 冇分別喎, 之所以 Ubuntu 咁快上位某程度上佢都係o係 Debia ...

選用openSUSE的原因無他的,就是一個完整的控制台YAST...其實係好重要...
因為欠缺這件東西,對使用者來說是很麻煩,但我又很欣賞DEB的管理套件...
所以只能用"如果可以的話"這沒有必要性的說話.
還有我認為openSUSE架構上很完整,完善支援XFS,不需外掛...
腳本上也是最有條理...技術上也有很多進取地方

[ 本帖最後由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 14:11 編輯 ]

valleybok

原帖由 samiux 於 2008-12-25 11:55 發表


Ubuntu has contribute to Linux kernel.  Ubuntu kernel is different to Debian kernel.  Ubuntu also develops some utilities for her distribution that also suit for other distributions.

Ubuntu has Ubu ...

我也知道各系統有各的道路,所以我後面也有說(但是都是後話啦)...
我只不過認為道路不是天定的,是人行的...我不想有廠方將LINUX攪成TOY一樣
抹殺LINUX的潛力

snoopy11hk

Linux 有太多 distribution, 無 commercial software 呢一條己經係死罪

foobar

原帖由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 13:48 發表
還有我認為openSUSE架構上很完整,完善支援XFS,不需外掛...

Sorry 問 D 低能問題, 因為我真係未用過 OpenSuSE

XFS 係指 X Font Server 定 XFS Filesystem?

foobar

原帖由 snoopy11hk 於 2008-12-25 14:13 發表
Linux 有太多 distribution, 無 commercial software 呢一條己經係死罪

點會冇 commercial software 呢, 只不過大部分都係 server 方面o既o者。 更何況有冇人寫 commercial software 罪不在 Linux, 只係 D commercial software vendor 覺得無 so 所以先至唔寫o者, 呢個都係雞先定蛋先o既問題 - 有 market 自然有 software, 有 software 自然有 market

再者, 大家要用 Linux 做 productivity use 最想要o既講黎講去咪又係 Microsoft Office 呢個 commercial software

samiux

原帖由 foobar 於 2008-12-25 14:29 發表


點會冇 commercial software 呢, 只不過大部分都係 server 方面o既o者。 更何況有冇人寫 commercial software 罪不在 Linux, 只係 D commercial software vendor 覺得無 so 所以先至唔寫o者, 呢個都係雞先定蛋先o ...

Agreed!  

There are many commercial Linux softwares for desktop and server in the world.  Please Google, thanks.

snoopy11hk

原帖由 samiux 於 2008-12-25 14:37 發表


Agreed!  

There are many commercial Linux softwares for desktop and server in the world.  Please Google, thanks.

PS for linux plz
MS office for linux plz
MS MSN for linux plz

samiux

原帖由 valleybok 於 2008-12-25 13:48 發表

選用openSUSE的原因無他的,就是一個完整的控制台YAST...其實係好重要...
因為欠缺這件東西,對使用者來說是很麻煩,但我又很欣賞DEB的管理套件...
所以只能用"如果可以的話"這沒有必要性的說話.
還有我認為openSUSE架構上很完整,完善支援XFS,不需外掛...
腳本上也是最有條理...技術上也有很多進取地方

Debian has a similar tools a Yast namely Apt and it also have GUI and text mode as Yast.