必思

但係我睇返係對落隻睇而唔係個扣，只係咁啱個扣同隻眼同一個距離



不過我認同係構圖有啲問題 ...
harryytm 發表於 2016-5-3 16:13

成張相最sharp既位就係個扣

harryytm

成張相最sharp既位就係個扣
必思 發表於 2016-5-3 16:17

所以話係劣作無講錯
我應該再近啲去影
Trial and error

raisin

所以話係劣作無講錯
我應該再近啲去影
Trial and error
harryytm 發表於 3-5-2016 16:26

如果要突顯隻貓被鎖鏈扣住好慘, 又無得話錯既

必思

如果要突顯隻貓被鎖鏈扣住好慘, 又無得話錯既
raisin 發表於 2016-5-3 16:30

所以前面都係講出感覺到隻貓好慘，俾人綁住眼光光

harryytm

This pretty much sums it up and also the reason why i'm just using a generic monitor as most if no ...
inzite 發表於 2016-5-2 21:30

I agree with you that generic monitor is good enough for photo editing.

Personally, an affordable, good enough monitor is what I need, and I think buying a high grade LCD monitor is not needed.

As you point out the importance to have an accurate enough monitor to work on, the fact is so far every monitor I've ever use before, the whitepoint is far off D65, the worst case I met before is the default 6500k color settings of a monitor turns out to be 7400K, that's why I need a Spyder 5 to help me tune it closer to sRGB.

harryytm

回覆 182# 勁爆小朋友

我Cal Mon嘅目的，只係想有個最接近sRGB標準嘅Mon，而再貴啲嘅Mon我就覺得無咩必要，對於一般
唔係揾食嘅話更加完全無需要。

至於人地用個未cal嘅mon睇我張相，我管唔到，但最少作為出相嗰個，我就覺得有需要跟返個標準嚟出啲相。

至於Hardcopy方面，我就真係唔怕煩會印相送比人，已經印過好多張相送返比我影過嘅人。

必思

I agree with you that generic monitor is good enough for photo editing.

Personally, an affordable ...
harryytm 發表於 2016-5-3 18:10

Trust your eyes..
Train your brain to process the colors

必思

所以話係劣作無講錯
我應該再近啲去影
Trial and error
harryytm 發表於 2016-5-3 16:26

    唔關遠或近，係一開始你冇俾個主題你想影乜
所以個構圖咪唔知點，亂影冇錯係會偶有佳作，但機會真係好微

calvin83

Trust your eyes..
Train your brain to process the colors
必思 發表於 2016-5-3 18:26

連你都轉channel?

必思

連你都轉channel?
calvin83 發表於 2016-5-3 18:43

    我用手機打英文快d