core2duo

haha, it is just a definition to show it is not necessarily "必然" as you said, not saying pr ...
Answer 發表於 2016-5-2 01:47

Slippery Slope 不是用來說明可能性，不要迴避問題
你又冇睇我#8的quote？

core2duo

I pointed out your fallacy and now you started sidetracking, a typical tactic of internet tro ...
Answer 發表於 2016-5-2 03:17

可以用Slippery Slope來point out可行性？出處，唔該~

core2duo

I pointed out your fallacy and now you started sidetracking, a typical tactic of internet tro ...
Answer 發表於 2016-5-2 03:17

你都系睇漏左個條件姐，洗乜死撐

Answer

我的說法是：裝多左軟件+電源功率不足有機會導致爆炸
我並非說單一裝多左軟件有機會導致爆炸，成日想set個 ...
core2duo 發表於 2016-5-2 03:19

    Now you're changing your argument, haha. Look at your original post
Btw, what is the trap you're talking about? are you having delusion?

Answer

Slippery Slope 不是用來說明可能性，不要迴避問題
你又冇睇我#8的quote？
core2duo 發表於 2016-5-2 03:24

    Of course I've read your quote in #8. But what has it to do with your fallacy?

Answer

可以用Slippery Slope來point out可行性？出處，唔該~
core2duo 發表於 2016-5-2 03:26

    see #42

Answer

你都系睇漏左個條件姐，洗乜死撐
core2duo 發表於 2016-5-2 03:29

    I think you're truly delusional, I was always referring to your whole argument (that chain thing), again, see#47. You seems like twisting thing a lot. Look at your argument, the fact it is a fallacy won't change no matter how many excuses / changing meaning you gave.