本帖最後由 shingfd 於 2010-3-29 11:58 編輯
40mm又無話濫唔濫既, 玩FPS不嬲都係以最短既時間制敵取勝
而M2,rpg7 依啲原意要黎打載具既, 個人認為可以減 ...
airlo 發表於 2010-3-29 11:38 
agree
whatever resource is available in the game, then it is meant to be used
and for the m2, i've already mentioned its potential too, just that given the specialization of engies it becomes more obvious to the general public (esp in HC)
however, i still think the power of launchers is a trade off for engie's comparatively weaker primary weapon
afterall, whos gonna take down the tanks if it requires a BUNCH of engies (sharing limited ammo as suggested) risking their lifes taking down the BIG FAT LADIES?
and what's the role for engies in maps where there're not many tanks? engaging enemies in mid-long range with their back-scratching silenced smgs?
i would suggest turning down the m2's ability to penetrate armor as a way to answer the public's demand though, as of now the m2's anti-infantry ability has outweight its weaker ability in taking down armors BY A FAR MARGIN |
簡體版
訂閱頻道
訂閱電子報
發表於 2010-3-29 11:57
| 
