標題: [隨身碟] kinston and Sandisk usb 3.0 隨身碟 16GB, which one better? [打印本頁]
作者: carsonhung 時間: 2012-11-13 19:43 標題: kinston and Sandisk usb 3.0 隨身碟 16GB, which one better?
Sandisk Extreme CZ80 16GB ($160 ?)
and Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 16GB ($130 ?)
from price dot com
Which one is better?
Anyone know the update price?
hope to have better read/write and stable
any other good c/p brand and model?
thanks a lot
作者: 無相 時間: 2012-11-13 23:20
sanddisk 會好 少少.
作者: johnl 時間: 2012-11-17 16:06
prefer sanddisk
作者: mansiu 時間: 2012-11-20 22:45
kingston 好多都好慢
作者: personc 時間: 2012-11-20 23:37
Sandisk la.....
作者: faibuy 時間: 2012-11-21 18:30
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: marcochl 時間: 2012-11-21 18:49
better speed = sandisk
no choice
作者: firehero 時間: 2012-11-29 16:48
我想問如果仲係行緊 usb2.0 咁係唔係隻隻都差唔多.... 唔洗買到cz80 呢d class 呢? thx ...
作者: carsonhung 時間: 2012-11-29 23:35
better buy those model support usb3.0 but don't need to buy those top models
I think start from 16GB of well-known brand to get a reliable speed.
http://www.price.com.hk/category ... n&filter=101077
http://www.kingston.com/tw/usb/personal_business
作者: 3615 時間: 2012-11-29 23:57
無奈地揀sandisk
作者: whitepepper 時間: 2012-11-30 13:50
My photo friends always perfer Sandisk rather than Kingston. They say Sandisk is much more stable.
作者: anon893 時間: 2012-11-30 14:09
Go for Sandisk -- as long as the QC is reliable
The aforementioned Kingston model is considered slow speed model... avoid

